The Growth of the LGBT Acronym

My Recent Posts

It has taken me many years to adjust to labelling a group of people into their preferred acronym LGBT.  I’ve inverted letters- LTBG or included others like when I inadvertently added an an “H” – LHGBT – under the thought that adding the “H” would include homosexuals.

 

Now I am seeing articles and arguments about the benefits or drawbacks of adding more letters.  One group has recommended LGBTQIAGNC (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual and gender-non-conforming).

 

Others propose including letters for ‘questioning’, ‘pansexual’, ‘ally’ or ‘allied’, ‘straight’, ‘leather’ and ‘fetish’ which would yield LGBTQIAGNCQPASLF.  I do find this somewhat bias because since I stopped dating I now consider myself a hydro-sexual.  I only have sex in the shower by myself.  We need to add an H.

 

In addition, what about:

Trisexuals, Necrosexuals, Animal-sexuals, Group Only sexuals, Egg roll stufers, Apple Pie lovers, and Liver-box lovers.  Certainly we could all handle LGBTQIAGNCQPASLFTNAGEAL to enforce the idea that heterosexuals are intolerant perverts.   

 

Further, pedophiles are rebranding themselves as MAPS – Minor Attracted Persons or NOMAPS (Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons), in an effort to gain acceptance and be included in the LGBT communities.  Certainly these misunderstood and marginalized people deserve inclusion.

 

So, unless you are a hate filled Republican you should show a little compassion and refer to these marginalized groups as LGBTQIAGNCQPASLFTNAGEALMAPSNOMAPS (subject to change).  If you don’t you are obviously a NAZZI, bigot, homophobe, uneducated and unable to do anything without blindly following Trump.  We, the enlightened, have you conservatives figured out.

Comments