Leaky Info: Rounding Up All The Usual Suspects.

My Recent Posts

I'm a political atheist, and frankly I’m tired of party politics interfering with my constitutional government. Much like religion, I think there should be a separation between party politics and government. If we don't stop this party nonsense now, every dollar bill will soon have printed on it "In Our Party We Trust". Nevertheless that is not what this article is about. But do give the above some thought and leave your politics aside when you read this article.

 

This article sets out to start a public investigation of opinion and theory surrounding the DNC leaks, Podesta phishing, CIA source code leaks, which all came to light in the middle of one the wildest presidential election I ever seen. These above mentioned leaks, some would say, may have helped Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. They certainly didn’t help her.

 

One does have to admit Hillary has had a lot of bad luck. I am sure she did a lot of bad stuff, but so has a lot of other people who are even worse than her. They aren't as unlucky as she is. But one saving point that you can take whichever way you want. She isn’t in jail, which I find to be astonishing, considering all the bad luck.

 

Thus far it appears like Hillary’s group had more contact with Russian agents than Trump’s people. And again, how unlucky can one be to get caught doing the thing one is accusing the other of doing? But out of all this I suppose I can pretty much assume Russia didn’t leak all the above damaging info that came from the DNC. Even Julian Assange said the Russians were not his source, right before he said wikileaks does not reveal its sources. I’ll leave that bit of word play for you to figure out. Nevertheless, there it is. The Russians didn’t do it, so don’t ever blame Russia, even if a bomb falls out of the sky and you see a Russian flag on the side of it. Chicken Little vs Crying Wolf-you make the call.

 

Anyway, the investigation moves forward. If Russia didn’t do it, then who is left from all the usual suspects, keeping in mind these leaks did nothing to advance Hillary’s bid for the presidency. My memory recalls almost every country voiced some concern about Trump's "deplorable" position on NATO and trade, etc.. There really wasn’t anyone in the Geo political limelight who wanted Trump to win, except Israel. Was there someone else?

 

Let's have a look at my chosen people, the state of Israel. Bibi and Obama/Hillary were at each other's throats over the Iran nuke deal. Perhaps, the animosity between the 2 wondered too far and maybe Bibi is the one who leaked the DNC info. Some SPECULATE Seth Rich leaked the info to wiki. Nevertheless, Seth Rich happens to be Jewish. Not that being Jewish matters more than facts. 

 

There is also that strange attraction Bibi has for Trump. Reuters reports "So proud is Netanyahu of his relationship with Trump that he has a picture of the two shaking hands at the top of his Facebook page." Again, none of this is more important than the facts, but it is what it is.

 

Here is a little interesting backround:

 

The US Senate has launched a bipartisan probe into the White House’s alleged funding of an NGO pushing for the ouster of Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, a source told Fox News.

According to the source, the US State Department apparently handed taxpayer-funded grants, worth $350,000, to the OneVoice Movement.

OneVoice allegedly forwarded the money to its subsidiary in Israel called Victory 15 (V15), which is committed to ousting Netanyahu due to the PM being an obstacle to the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, brokered by the US.

“It’s confirmed that there is a bipartisan Permanent Subcommittee inquiry into OneVoice’s funding of V15,” the source said.

OneVoice is prohibited from directly targeting Netanyahu by US law and can only do it through its Israeli partner, V15.

According to Fox News, V15 is “itself guided by top operatives of Obama’s White House,” with Jeremy Bird, who was Obama’s deputy national campaign director in 2008 and national field director in 2012, arriving in Israel to direct the group.

There’s been no confirmation from a US Senate investigatory committee, which is a body with subpoena powers, that such a probe is under way.

One Voice spokesman Payton Knox has denied allegations that the NGO is working with the White House to affect the outcome of Tuesday’s Israeli election.

"OneVoice is eager to cooperate with any inquiry,” Knox said. “And after a fair examination, we are confident no wrongdoing will be found.”

Netanyahu has accused left-wing forces in Israel and abroad of orchestrating an “Anyone but Bibi” campaign, aimed at removing him from power after six years as prime minister.

"Left-wing and media elements in Israel and abroad have conspired to bring [Zionist Union leaders, Isaac Herzog and Tzipi Livni] to power illegitimately, by means of slander at home and unprecedented money from abroad," the PM said Friday, Haaretz reported.

On Monday, Netanyahu once again showed himself an opponent of a two-state solution, insisting there would be no Palestinian state as long as he remained Israel’s prime minister.

READ MORE: No Palestinian state if I remain PM – Israel’s Netanyahu on election eve

No direct link can be established between President Obama and the campaign against the Israeli PM, with the State Department announcing that it stopped funding OneVoice in November 2014 – before the election was called in Israel.

The antipathy between Obama and Netanyahu is well known, with the US president refusing to meet the Israeli PM on his recent American trip and criticizing Netanyahu’s speech to the Senate.

Recent polls show that Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party is trailing the centrist Zionist Union with hours remaining before the beginning of the vote in Israel.

“I don’t think that President Obama is sending money to the leftist parties in Israel,” Yossi Beilin, a former member of Israel's Labor Party, told RT.

However, he said that when it comes to Washington’s support of human rights NGOs in Israel, “then this is something else.”

https://www.rt.com/news/241237-obama-netanyahu-senate-israel/

 

 

Obama attempted to unseat Bibi by interfering with Israel 2015 March election, Against our own constitution, Bibi  addressed congress without Obama's invitation before the Iran nuke deal vote in a last attempt to end the final approval, unsuccessfully of course. On his way out Obama commit the sin of all sins and abstained from UN vote condemning Israel's settlement expansions. For the first time the USA did not back Israel. Unprecedented.

 

Wikileaks opened up a can of whoop-ass that is now proving that Obama and Hillary were spying on everyone. I bet they were even spying on Bibi. Is the following news a coincidence, bad luck, or the result of Obama's gathered Intel on Bibi?

 

"Israeli police on Tuesday recommended that the 68-year-old, four-term prime minister be indicted for bribery in two cases."

 

Reuters news.

 

Makes you wonder who had the info on Bibi and dropped the dime/info? Also makes you wonder who had the info on Obama/Hillary and dropped the dime/info.

 

We still do not know who Wikileaks got all this information from and started the snowball rolling down the hill. Seems no one wants to talk about it, which most of the time means, no one wants to talk about it. Just the facts

 

 

Commissioner Sir Charles Braithwaite: You must trust no one. The viper in our bosom could be anyone.

Inspector Jacques Clouseau: I suspect everyone!

Commissioner Sir Charles Braithwaite: You will report only to me.

Inspector Jacques Clouseau: And what makes you think I trust you?

 

 

 

Comments

Autumn Cote Added Feb 14, 2018 - 4:51am
Please note, it's against the rules to post more than one article within a 48-hour period.  As always, many thanks for your participation with Writer Beat!
opher goodwin Added Feb 14, 2018 - 5:09am
You don't suspect Peter Sellers do you?
Phil Greenough Added Feb 14, 2018 - 8:24am
While I don’t consider myself to be a Democrat or Republican (do any of us?) either, I also don’t believe all of them are involved in criminal activity and bad luck is the only reason Hillary’s criminal acts were brought to light.  The reason she’s in the news is because her corruption was blatant and long-lasting.  As for why she’s not currently in jail, that has to do with evidence.  She’s simply too far removed from the corruption to say with certainty she orchestrated it.  Not to mention the fact that much of the incriminating evidence was deleted.  Besides, we’re not the type of country that jails politicians very frequently, she’s gone and that should be enough for the country to move forward. 
Dave Volek Added Feb 14, 2018 - 11:39am
FEC
 
Welcome to Writer Beat---and nice article.
 
I couldn't help but wonder that all this must be true because it's hard to imagine someone making up these kinds of stories!
 
Hillary Clinton is a paradox. On one hand, she deserved to lose the election based on her handling of the emails (and a few other things). On the other hand, she probably would not have risen as high as she did in politics without having done these kinds of actions on her way to the almost top. It is almost a case of making the right stupid move at the right time. 
 
To my thinking, if we get rid of the political parties, we also get rid of all this intrigue as overly ambitious people compete for power and influence.
 
BTW, I have a secret agenda myself. I have written a book about why we need to get rid of political parties--and replace them with a different kind of elected representative.
 
You might be interested.
 
 

Recent Articles by Writers Free Ear Candy follows.